Reincarnation/Karma/Talents (1 of 2)

You have no doubt often heard anthroposophists say when they meet a good arithmetician: “In his previous incarnation this man was a good arithmetician!” Unfortunately, many undeveloped anthroposophists string together links of reincarnation in such a way that it is thought possible to find the earlier incarnation because the present gifts must have existed in the preceding incarnation or in many previous incarnations. This is the worst possible form of speculation and anything derived from it is usually false. True observation by means of Spiritual Science, discloses, as a rule, the exact opposite. For example, people who in a former incarnation were good arithmeticians, good mathematicians, often reappear with no gift for mathematics at all. If we wish to discover what gifts we may probably have possessed in a former incarnation (here I must remind you that we are speaking of probabilities!) — if we wish to know what intellectual or artistic faculties, say, we possessed in a former incarnation, it is well to reflect upon those things for which we have least talent in the present life.

These are true indications, but they are very often interwoven with other facts. It may happen that a man had a special talent for mathematics in a former incarnation but died young, so that this talent never came to full expression; then he will be born again in his next incarnation with a talent for mathematics and this will represent a continuation of the previous incarnation. Abel, the mathematician who died young, will certainly in his next incarnation be reborn with a strong mathematical talent.  But when a mathematician has lived to a great age, so that his talent has spent itself — then in his next incarnation he will be stupid as regards mathematics. I knew a man who had so little gift for mathematics that as a schoolboy he simply hated figures, and although in other subjects he did well, he generally managed to get through his classes only because he obtained exceptionally good marks in other subjects. This was because in his former incarnation he had been an exceedingly good mathematician.

To be continued

Source: Rudolf Steiner – GA 135 – Reincarnation and Karma – I – Berlin, 23rd January 1912

Translated by Dorothy S. Osmond & Charles Davy

Previously posted on 14 October 2014

Anthroposophy is not a religion but an instrument for understanding religions

Anthroposophy is not a religion but an instrument for understanding religions. It’s related to religion in about the same way that our mathematical theory is related to ancient math books. One can understand mathematics out of one’s own intellectual forces and the laws of space without referring to Euclid’s geometry book. But when one has taken in geometric teachings one will treasure that old book all the more, that first placed these laws before the human spirit. That’s the way it is with anthroposophy. Its sources are not in documents and aren’t based on tradition. Its sources are in the real spiritual worlds; that’s where one must find them and grasp them in that one develops one’s spiritual forces, whereas one grasps mathematics as one tries to develop one’s intellectual forces.

Source: Rudolf Steiner – GA 266 – From the Contents of Esoteric Classes: Esoteric Lesson – Berlin, 1903 or 1904

Previously posted on 8 november 2013

Set of religious signs. Icons for religion faith
Set of religious signs. Collection of golden symbols for different religion and faith isolated on black background. Icons vector illustration. Islam, christianity, judaism and others various religions

Anthroposophy is not a religion but an instrument for understanding religions

Anthroposophy is not a religion but an instrument for understanding religions. It’s related to religion in about the same way that our mathematical theory is related to ancient math books. One can understand mathematics out of one’s own intellectual forces and the laws of space without referring to Euclid’s geometry book. But when one has taken in geometric teachings one will treasure that old book all the more, that first placed these laws before the human spirit. That’s the way it is with anthroposophy. Its sources are not in documents and aren’t based on tradition. Its sources are in the real spiritual worlds; that’s where one must find them and grasp them in that one develops one’s spiritual forces, whereas one grasps mathematics as one tries to develop one’s intellectual forces. 

Source: Rudolf Steiner – GA 266 – From the Contents of Esoteric Classes: Esoteric Lesson – Berlin, 1903 or 1904